Sunday, July 31, 2005

Rejoice over CAFTA ! Chavez is pissed

Says Publius Pundit.......

.....for Chavez, it’s pain upon pain. Not only has Central America repudiated him utterly, in favor of the U.S.A., and set up a bulwark against tyranny on the Caribbean’s entire western flank. Chavez’s whole Masterplan For The Takeover Of The Americas has been destroyed. There will be no big prize of Mexico at the end of the communist rainbow for Chavez and Fidel Castro, the pass has just been blocked forever. And Danny Ortega is sunk, too.
Rejoice anew about the stunning victory that was CAFTA this week, a great collective effort by the peoples all over this country and Latin America to make prosperity, not state control, the answer to all that ails the hemisphere.

ME: this is a fantastic victory for free trade and those who would lift others out of poverty through a hand up, not a hand out. Next we need to pass the SACU FTA (southern african countries) Thailand, and perhaps Kuwait, Oman, UAE and Qatar. That would be a great follow-up.

Beginning to see a link between Iran and Iraq here

Captian's Quarters talks about Iran's refusal to halt uranium processing, basically taunting the EU.

The UNSC will probably see a tremendous fight over this issue, one which will look very similar to the debate on Iraq. Again, France, Russia, and China all have commercial and military ties to the Islamic republic and have vested business interests in keeping sanctions off of Teheran. However, they can hardly recommend no action at all for Iranian instransigence on nonproliferation; to do so would send a green light for other nations so inclined to start arming themselves with nuclear weaponry. Russia hardly wants to see the Central Asian republics that formerly comprised the Soviet Union to get ideas about countering Iranian nuclear power. For that matter, neither would China.
So what will happen, if Iran does not back down and Europe pulls out? I suspect that France, Russia, and China will agree to some form of economic sanctions only after referring the matter back to the IAEA once for renegotiation while Iran continues working on the bomb. After that, they will work once again to undermine the sanctions and keep their commercial interests alive in Iran, just as they did with Iraq.
The one wild card will be the Anglo-American partnership that took matters into their own hands in Iraq after the UNSC refused to act after sixteen formal demands for Iraqi compliance on their cease-fire agreement. The three other veto-wielding UNSC members will recall that their obtuseness led to a war despite their best efforts to prop up their last client state. It might convince them to put enough pressure on the Iranian mullahcracy to reconsider their position. It probably won't work, but they will certainly want to try.


I think we are starting to see the issue come to a head, where negotiation has failed. Clearly there is a different situation in North Korea. I see paralleles with the timeline of Iran, and Iraq.
Clearly we have no military flexibility now, and that will need to change if we are forced to confront a nuclear Iran. Yikes. Not a good situation.

Update on Maximum penalty in the UK, even for High Treason & Murder

Life imprisonment is now the maximum punishment for High Treason, after the government successfully managed to remove the death penalty for this offence by a clause in the 1998 Criminal Justice Bill that passed virtually unnoticed by everyone. Membership of the EU and the adoption of the EU convention on human rights further precludes the use of the death penalty as does the government's attitude towards it.

So says Richard Clark, proprietor of http://www.richard.clark32.btinternet.co.uk/contents.html

thanks Richard.

Saturday, July 30, 2005

Terrorism against Americans, British, Egyptian, Israeli or Iraqi is just that.....terrorism

http://xrdarabia.org/blog/index.php, which I link to my my Egypt blogs section, does a great justice for the people of the Middle East by highlighting several themes emerging from the Middle East:

"1. The truth remains that Islamic extremism, otherwise loosely referred to as al Qaeda and is affiliates, is squarely to blame for all the death and destruction we are currently witnessing

2. Arab reformists further expanded their criticism and honed their arguments, not only regarding Muslim extremists, but also regarding the European countries, particularly Britain, which allows extremist activity within its borders in the name of protecting individual rights.

3. They also increased their criticism of the silent Muslim majority and moderate Muslim intellectuals, who capitulate to Islamist pressure and do not speak out decisively against it. "


ME:
It is vital, that since we have opened the eyes of the Middle East to the death and destruction of Muslims by Muslims (with our proactive invasion of Iraq & defensive invasion of Afghanistan), that they begin to stand up and speak against extremism, terrorism and dictatorship.

Without such vital statements, that civilization will increasingly be excluded from the west through immigration controls, cutting of economic ties, and will not enjoy the benefits of increased democracy in their own countries.

Just wondering...what is the most current interpretation of the EU and UK maximum penalty for High Treason and murder?

Just musing, but could these bombers be sentenced to death in the UK for treason during time of war?

20th May 1998. On a free vote during a debate on the Human Rights Bill, MPs decided by 294 to 136, a 158 majority, to adopt provisions of the European Convention on Human Rights outlawing capital punishment for murder except "in times of war or imminent threat of war". The Bill incorporates the European Convention on Human Rights into British law.

July 31st 1998. The Criminal Justice Bill of this year removed High treason and piracy with violence as capital crimes, thus effectively ending capital punishment.

27th January 1999. The Home Secretary (Jack Straw) formally signed the 6th protocol of the European Convention of Human Rights in Strasbourg, on behalf of the British government formally abolishing the death penalty in the UK. It had been still theoretically available for treason and piracy up to 1998 but it was extremely unlikely that even if anyone had been convicted of these crimes over the preceding 30 years that they would have actually been executed. Successive Home Secretaries had always reprieved persons sentenced to death in the Channel Islands and Isle of Man where the death sentence for murder could still be passed and the Royal Prerogative was observed.

Terrorism is universally unacceptable

The egypt blog highlights the murder of "probably" innocent kids in Iran, and further down, the murderous bombs earlier in the month in Sharm el-Sheikh. My sympathies, naturally.

With London and this most recent event, it is clear to me at least, all targets of violent extremists are unacceptable.

Thank you for your service

The freedom and responsibility that comes from starting a blog is really amazing, and I will never know whose eyes visit this site. Sometimes, though, comments or emails roll in that really open my eyes.

Thanks for reading, and thank you for your service.

jp

Lebanese Govt. Policy paper - newly written after the election and translated

I found this via http://bedouina.typepad.com/

One of the benefits of a reasonably transparent and free election is a government that can be held accountable for progress. The Government Policy Statement of Lebanon has been translated by Doha at http://lebaneseblogger.blogspot.com/ . Now the government can be held accountable if it does not stay true to its promises.

Here is one highlight:
Electoral Policy: Instate a modern and just electoral process, which includes a policy that encourages the formation of modern political parties and lowering the voting age to 18. Establish a special National Commission to draw up the framework of the new electoral process. The Commission will include within it all the political parties and blocs that will contribute in the passing of the new law. The government promises that the Commission’s work will take no more than 5 months and passing it in Parliament should take place within a month thereafter.

Poland is demonstrating its support for Democracy and Freedom for the people of Belarus.

Seems to me that Poland is a much more important country internationally these days, than France.

IHT, via Charter 97
"Poles deserve the West`s support16:18, 29/07/2005, By Mark Lenzi, International Herald Tribune
One of the more dramatic political dramas playing out in Europe this summer is the profound increase in tension between new NATO and EU member Poland and its eastern neighbor, the pariah state of Belarus.Almost unheard of in Europe nowadays, a political shoving match complete with a war of words, the expulsions of numerous diplomats from Warsaw and Minsk and, on Thursday, Poland`s recall of its ambassador, has broken out between the two countries over the Belarusian government`s harassment and poor treatment of ethnic Poles living in Belarus.The ethnic Polish community in Belarus - about 400,000 people or roughly 4 percent of the Belarusian population - has been square in the crosshairs of the Belarusian dictator Aleksandr Lukashenko ever since the Orange Revolution in neighboring Ukraine last year toppled a like-mindedly corrupt regime. Lukashenko`s fear that he will be ousted in a similar popular uprising has caused him to crack down brutally on minorities and organizations that he fears may not continue to stay silent in the face of his illegitimate and increasingly authoritarian rule. Topping his hit list was the Union of Poles in Belarus - the largest nongovernmental organization in the country and one with democratic credentials and close ties to Poland.In actions straight out of Soviet Political Methodology 101, the Belarusian government last month orchestrated an illegal coup within the Union of Poles in Belarus and replaced the democratically elected leadership with their own cronies and closed the country`s main Polish-language newspaper, instead printing a bogus paper with the same name and format that praised the regime in every aspect. These actions have run parallel with arrests, detentions and show trials of average citizens and journalists in order to instill a sense of fear within the ethnic Polish community and the Belarusian population at large.Poland, which has quietly asserted itself as a regional leader and anchor of stability in Eastern Europe, has responded to these actions with outrage and tough rhetoric and has expelled numerous Belarusian diplomats. It recalled its ambassador on Thursday after a raid on a building near the Polish border, used by ethnic Poles. At the same time, it called on the European Union to impose sanctions on the Belarusian leadership."

I Missed this, but President Bush met with an opposition political figure from Belarus

http://www.charter97.org/eng/news/2005/07/25/bush

George W. Bush declared support to Belarusian democratic forces President of the United States of Amerika George W. Bush supports process of uniting Belarusian democratic forces. American President told it in informal meeting with vice-chairman of BNF party Aliaksey Yanukevich in the White House.“It was a meeting of party leaders of International democratic union. This organization unites rightist parties all over the world. Such meetings happen annually. This year it took place in Washington D.C. About 200 people took part in it. Among them there were several Prime ministers and leaders of ruling parties. The other day we had a round table in the White House. George W. Bush was leading it. Belarus was very important issue of the conversation, and even the most important,” - said vice-chairman of BNF party Aliaksey Yanukevich who took part in the meeting.Photo by svaboda.org

Expanding on the Uzbekistan decision

As I wrote about this last week, and received some very kind links from several folks,
http://americansforfreedom.blogspot.com/2005/07/i-could-be-wrongbut-i-think-rumsfeld.html
I thought we were demonstrating our support for democratic regimes over undemocratic ones, by visiting Kyrgyz, Tajik and not Uzbekistan, after the massacre at Andijon. (Please pardon the abbreviations, those names are really long)

Yesterday, we received news that our military base presence in Uzbekistan is no longer desired. This comes purely due to our protestations of the massacre in Andijon, demands for a real investigation, and our support for Uzbek refugees in Kyrgyz.

Historically speaking (before 9/11), I believe that we would have caved on this question, because the base (K2) has been very important to our military stabilization efforts in Afghanistan. However, because it is now in our interests to adhere as close as possible to our democratic ideals when acting internationally, we had to take our lumps here, and try to make do without, which will be a problem, but hopefully, we can get closer to our Tajik friends, who hopefully will move towards the Kyrgyz model for governance.

I think it is in our interests to as close as possible to our democratic ideals when acting internationally, as stated many times here on this blog, because:

if we do not fight this war now, and change the culture of dictatorships across the middle east that foster the hatred demonstrated on 9/11, we will suffer an attack in the future, so brutal that we will be forced to end certain civilizations, thereby ending our own.
February 23, 2005.
After 9/11, Americans realized that the foreign policy in effect for the Middle East for nearly 60 years was a mistake. In order to contain the Soviet Union and ensure a steady supply of oil to the Free world, our leaders made the strategic decision to support dictators in many of the countries in South West Asia, which led to theft of state property by corruption, high unemployment and overall mismanagement of these countries. The US focused on one problem - the Soviet Union, and unfortunately, millions of people suffered. Now, however, President Bush made the inspired choice to fix this error, and to support the freedoms that everyone on Earth fully deserve. The people of Afghanistan, unfree and mired in wars for decades are now free and slowly beginning to prosper, 10 Million of them voting for liberty. The people of Iraq, suffering under a madman for decades are now taking control of their own freedom, with the assistance of the US military. 8 million people voted in Iraq, and they will continue to gain in freedom, security and prosperity. The people of Lebanon deserve to be free, to not have to live under imprisonment and threat of car bombs. The people of Syria, Iran deserve to have representative governments, not be led under repressive dictatorships, either by Baathist thugs or religious Mullahs.
As President Bush spoke at the second inaugural:
We have seen our vulnerability - and we have seen its deepest source. For as long as whole regions of the world simmer in resentment and tyranny - prone to ideologies that feed hatred and excuse murder - violence will gather, and multiply in destructive power, and cross the most defended borders, and raise a mortal threat. There is only one force of history that can break the reign of hatred and resentment, and expose the pretensions of tyrants, and reward the hopes of the decent and tolerant, and that is the force of human freedom.

I think this result in Uzbekistan is a direct result of our new policy of encouraging democracy, and though damaging to our efforts, makes me proud to be an American.

And there it goes. No more US base in Uzbekistan

ME: so they kicked us out, because we wouldnt shut up about democracy. That should shut up many critics of US policy in the world. Not like it actually will, but it should, because this is serious policy, for th egood of people, not dictators.

WaPost:
Uzbekistan formally evicted the United States yesterday from a military base that has served as a hub for combat and humanitarian missions to Afghanistan since shortly after the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, Pentagon and State Department officials said yesterday.
In a highly unusual move, the notice of eviction from Karshi-Khanabad air base, known as K2, was delivered by a courier from the Uzbek Foreign Ministry to the U.S. Embassy in Tashkent, said a senior U.S. administration official involved in Central Asia policy. The message did not give a reason. Uzbekistan will give the United States 180 days to move aircraft, personnel and equipment, U.S. officials said.
If Uzbekistan follows through, as Washington expects, the United States will face several logistical problems for its operations in Afghanistan. Scores of flights have used K2 monthly. It has been a landing base to transfer humanitarian goods that then are taken by road into northern Afghanistan, particularly to Mazar-e Sharif -- with no alternative for a region difficult to reach in the winter. K2 is also a refueling base with a runway long enough for large military aircraft. The alternative is much costlier midair refueling.
Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld returned this week from Central Asia, where he won assurances from Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan that the United States can use their bases for operations in Afghanistan. U.S. forces use Tajikistan for emergency landings and occasional refueling, but it lacks good roads into Afghanistan. Kyrgyzstan does not border Afghanistan.
"We always think ahead. We'll be fine," Rumsfeld said Sunday when asked how the United States would cope with losing the base in Uzbekistan.
In May, however, Pentagon spokesman Bryan Whitman called access to the airfield "undeniably critical in supporting our combat operations" and humanitarian deliveries. The United States has paid $15 million to Uzbek authorities for use of the airfield since 2001, he said.
Yesterday, Pentagon spokesman Lawrence T. Di Rita said that the U.S. military does not depend on one base in any part of the world. "We'll be able to conduct our operations as we need to, regardless of how this turns out. It's a diplomatic issue at the moment," Di Rita said.

ME: Here's the kicker. We could have saved the base if we caved on core democracy principles, but screw that. We just saved $22 million that we can now dedicate to more democracy fostering efforts:

Uzbekistan has been widely viewed as an important test for the Bush administration -- and whether the anti-terrorism efforts or promotion of democracy takes priority. "We all knew basically that if we really wanted to keep access to the base, the way to do it was to shut up about democracy and turn a blind eye to the refugees," said the senior official, on the condition of anonymity because of the sensitive diplomacy. "We could have saved the base if we had wanted."
After the latest setback in relations, the Bush administration is going to "wait for a cooling-off period," the administration official said. "We are assuming they mean it and want us out. We are now not sending someone to Uzbekistan."
The next test will be whether to withhold as much as $22 million in aid to Uzbekistan if it does not comply with provisions on political and economic reforms it committed to undertake in a 2002 strategic partnership agreement with Washington. Last year, the administration withheld almost $11 million. U.S. officials expect the Uzbek government will again be ineligible for funds.

The Party for American Business

clearly the vtes on CAFTA, Energy and Transportation prove that the Republican party is the only party today looking out for American business today.
One thing, I want to thank the 15 Democrats for putting their careers on the line on the CAFTA vote.
here they are, in order (some i actually knew without looking up):
Bean, IL
Cooper TN
Cuellar, TX
Dicks WA
Hinojosa TX
Jefferson, LA
Matheson, UT
Meeks (NY)
Moore (KS)
Moran (VA)
Ortiz TX
Skelton, MO
Snyder AR
Tanner TN
Towns NY

Friday, July 29, 2005

For my Ohio CD 2 Readers: Vote Jean Schmidt for Congress on Tuesday

Probably the funniest comments section ever...go read it

here's a sample from the comments at Ace, and it keeps getting better:


Darius I, II and III ruled Persia.
Posted by: Bill from INDC on July 28, 2005 03:32 PM
Persia, by the way, was the arch-enemy of Athens.
You've essentially mistaken Stalin for a President of the United States. Good job.
Posted by: Pompous on July 28, 2005 03:34 PM
Still waiting for that Oliver Willis-Japanese fembot joke, btw.
Posted by: Bill from INDC on July 28, 2005 03:35 PM
Xerxes then. Who can keep them straight?
I sure can't.
Posted by: ace on July 28, 2005 03:36 PM
Me, a lowly Athenien? I shall crush you as the Spartans at Thermopylae.
Posted by: Xerxes on July 28, 2005 03:50 PM
Shame on you, Ace.
Posted by: Victor Davis Hanson on July 28, 2005 03:55 PM
Me, a lowly Athenien? I shall crush you as the Spartans at Thermopylae.
Whatever, Xerxes. An army of 120,000 retards could have defeated that picket of 300 man-touchers faster than you.
Oh, and your navy fought like pansies at Salamis, bitch.
Posted by: Themistocles on July 28, 2005 04:04 PM
Yeah, ok, I screwed the pooch on those.

Thursday, July 28, 2005

Congratulations to the Dominican Republic, Costa Rica, El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras and Nicaragua

President Bush: "By lowering trade barriers to American goods in Central American markets to a level now enjoyed by their goods in the U.S.," he said in the statement, "this agreement will level the playing field and help American workers, farmers and small businesses."

Since election, President Bush has lowered trade barriers between the United States and the following countries, representing 4.5+% of total bilateral trade :

Country, total bilateral trade
Singapore, 34906488
Australia, 21815064
Chile, 8358550
Morocco, 1038712
Bahrain, 705991
Dominican Republic, 8871302
Costa Rica, 6636683
Honduras, 6717579
Guatemala, 5702830
El Salvador, 3920421
Nicaragua, 1582176

Further agreements are in discussion with the following nations representing 2.27% of total bilateral trade:

Lesotho, 472355
Botswana, 126975
Namibia, 311169
South Africa, 9115534
Swaziland, 211171
Kuwait, 4750225
Qatar, 841953
United Arab Emirates, 5205468
Oman, 747742
Thailand, 23940095
Egypt, 4434501
Panama, 2136151
Bolivia, 454463
Colombia, 11794335
Ecuador, 5950550
Peru, 5795157

Wednesday, July 27, 2005

Free Trade can raise standards of living

Robert Mayer points out the AGOA act - reduced US import duties on goods from 26 nations in Africa. He also points out that the best way to fix Africa is to lower ag. subsidies.

"With Africans steadily losing hope in the promises made to them, it’s time for the Unites States and Europe to put up or shut up. The past twenty years have shown that aiding and relieving governments in Africa has been the greatest contribution to the obliteration of human rights for the most amount of people in such a short amount of time. Bypassing these governments and taking trade straight to the everyday African will not only alleviate poverty, but put into place the conditions necessary for democratic governments that respect human rights. "


I agree. In fact, I believe there is progress to be made on this front, and this will be coming in the next year or so. The US has clearly demonstrated to Europe that we can compete on the vast amount of subsidies wasted on ag., and that both the US and Europe should reduce them significantly.

http://thesoydailyclub.com/Farm&Market/bush07122005.asp
"Gleneagles, Scotland - July 7, 2005 - President Bush said he wants to work with the European Union (EU) to end agricultural export subsidies for U.S. and EU farmers by 2010, a move that would help farmers in developing countries better compete in the global market.
Addressing the press July 7 with British Prime Minister Tony Blair, Bush said, “I think it’s very important for the world to hear very clearly the position of the United States and that is we want to work with the EU to rid our respective countries of agricultural subsides.
“I would hope that by 2010 that the Doha Round will achieve that objective,” Bush said, in reference to ongoing negotiations regarding a multilateral trade liberalization pact drawn up by the World Trade Organization (WTO) in Doha, Qatar, in 2001. Bush said the next meetings on the Doha Round, scheduled to take place in Hong Kong in December, is “the best place” to negotiate the issue."

Pakistan is starting to deliver...

ISLAMABAD, Pakistan, July 27 - A prime suspect in the kidnapping and killing of Daniel Pearl was arrested Wednesday by Pakistani intelligence agents, officials said.
The suspect, Mohammad Hashim Qadeer, is accused of arranging a first meeting between Mr. Pearl and Ahmed Omar Saeed Sheikh at a hotel in Rawalpindi, a city near the capital of Islamabad. Mr. Pearl, a reporter for The Wall Street Journal, was later lured by Mr. Sheikh to a January 2002 meeting in the southern port city of Karachi, where he was abducted and, eventually, beheaded.
Mr. Sheikh and three defendants were convicted of the murder, although only Mr. Sheikh received a death sentence. He remains in jail on appeal, to the frustration of Mr. Pearl's parents, who noted recently that the hearing for his appeal was recently adjourned for the 32nd time.
In the wake of the July 7 bombings in London, Pakistani authorities have come under heavy pressure to show they are cracking down on extremists. Three of the bombers in those attacks were British citizens of Pakistani descent, and had visited Pakistan in the last year. Pakistani officials say 600 extremists have been rounded up in the crackdown.
Mr. Qadeer, a militant belonging to a banned extremist group, Harkat-ul-Mujahedeen, was arrested in the eastern city of Gujranwala in Punjab Province early Wednesday morning, an intelligence official said. Harkat was designated a terrorist organization by the United States in October 2001.

I call on Congress to pass CAFTA today

We must support our newly democratic neighbors in an area of the world where dictators are threatening. This bill has the added benefit of opening central american markets to US goods by eliminating their tarriffs.

Tuesday, July 26, 2005

I could be wrong.....but I think Rumsfeld just confirmed our support for democratic regimes over undemocratic ones

I think the emphasis of this story in the WaPost is important today. No visit to Uzbekistan, comment that we can do without their help.

"Rumsfeld described relations with Uzbekistan as "good" but said the U.S. military could do "fine" without the base. He said he had no plans to visit Uzbekistan and repeatedly declined to answer questions about the relationship, referring them to the State Department."

In contrast, warm words for Kyrgyzstan and understanding words for Tajikistan

"In an earlier meeting, Rumsfeld congratulated Kyrgyzstan's president-elect, Kurmanbek Bakiyev, on his landslide victory in a July 10 election -- the first vote in a former Soviet republic that has won "passing grades" for fairness from international observers, Rumsfeld said. "Both you and your country had a victory in that election," he told Bakiyev, who has led the nation of 5 million people since widespread protests forced the former president to flee in March."

"The deployment of American forces in the Kyrgyz Republic fully depends on the situation in Afghanistan," Ismail Isakov, Kyrgyzstan's defense minister, said during a news conference with Rumsfeld at the presidential palace in Bishkek. "The air base in Manas will stay as long as the situation in Afghanistan requires."
Isakov implied that U.S. forces would leave after security conditions in Afghanistan improve. "Once there is stabilization, there will be no need" for U.S. troops, he said. "But now I agree with Mr. Secretary, who mentioned that the situation in Afghanistan is far from stable."


"Foreign Minister Talbak Nazarov confirmed Tajikistan's position at a joint appearance with Rumsfeld before reporters on the lawn of the presidential dacha. "We intend to continue our active cooperation with the United States and other anti-terrorist coalition in terms of the anti-terrorist struggle," Nazarov said through an interpreter.
He specifically mentioned Tajikistan's continued willingness to grant the United States overflight rights and access to ground facilities. The U.S. military stations no troops in Tajikistan, but it has emergency landing rights and a "gas and go" agreement that permits U.S. planes to refuel at Tajik airfields on their way to Afghanistan.
Rumsfeld and Tajik leaders also discussed bolstering U.S. military and government aid to help Tajikistan secure its rugged frontiers. The U.S. offer comes after Russian forces that guarded Tajikistan's border with Afghanistan completed a withdrawal this month. They had been stationed here since the end of a bloody civil war in 1997."

Pakistan - pretty much screwed unless they deliver bin Laden and destroy the rest of the network

BY now it is pretty much clear that Pakistan has not done enough to find and kill bin laden, and is also giving a free reign to madrassas fostering hatred and bigotry towards western values. It is high time that they were pressured into getting on the ball. Finally the Brits are getting tough with them.

Also, its pretty clear that Londonistan on the Thames will be getting a makeover as well. Bakri, and all the other bigoted Islamofacsists will hopefully all be deported to the countries from which they left. Making war on your own country will be punished in the UK now.

Thursday, July 21, 2005

Kevin Drum, Liberal, on Joe Wilson's lies

Read it all.

"Here, then, are the three lies:

1
Back in the days before he wrote his op-ed, Wilson was an anonymous source for a couple of Nick Kristof columns. In those columns, Wilson (via Kristof) claimed that he had seen the Niger memorandum and had reported to the CIA that it was forged. In fact, Wilson had not seen the memorandum back in February 2002 (he had only heard about it) and had no idea if it was a forgery.
Wilson's response: None, really. Wilson does some hemming and hawing about other press acounts, but for some reason nobody has asked him about the Kristof columns.
Possible mitigation: In his NYT op-ed, Wilson wrote, "as for the actual memorandum, I never saw it." So while Wilson pretty clearly misspoke to Kristof, he corrected himself on this point over a year ago.
2
Wilson claimed he had "debunked" the uranium story and that Dick Cheney knew this. In fact, his report was only one piece of evidence, not a conclusive debunking, and it was never shown to Cheney.
Wilson's response: He claims that he never said he had singlehandedly debunked the story. What's more, although he believes that the 16 words were "a deliberate attempt to deceive," he bases this conclusion on more than just his own trip to Niger.
Possible mitigation: The best defense of Wilson's claims is that ten days after his op-ed was published CIA Director George Tenet publicly admitted that the evidence for the uranium claims was weak and should not have been included in the State of the Union Address. That's pretty strong confirmation that whether or not it was Wilson who did the debunking, the intelligence community pretty much agreed with him.
Beyond that, this is obviously a matter of opinion. There's not much question that Wilson has been outspoken in his opposition to the Bush administration, but trying to gauge exactly how categorical his claims have been is a mug's game. As for Cheney, Wilson says that he really did think Cheney had seen his report and is surprised to learn that he didn't.
3
Wilson claimed that his wife, CIA agent Valerie Plame, was not involved in the decision to send him to Niger. However, although the evidence is contradictory about whether Plame recommended him in the first place, she did write a memo to her superiors telling them that Wilson was well qualified for the trip they had in mind.
Wilson's response: He says that his wife had nothing to do with the trip and deliberately recused herself from meetings related to it. Her memo was written in response to her boss, and was limited to a recitation of his qualifications.
Possible mitigation: None. Wilson said flatly that "Valerie had nothing to do with the matter," and apparently that's just not true. It's especially unclear why he said this when the truth would have been perfectly adequate."

View updates of Yemen protests via Jane

Yemen is an easy example of how dictatorships lead to corruption, unemployment, and general unhappiness, leading to extremism and terrorism.

Short term unrest may lead to long term freedom here. Would be a good thing, if it doesnt turn into a totally failed state from its near-failed state now.

Joe Wilson is a Liar and a fraud

The Washington Post, July 10, 2004: "The panel found that Wilson's report, rather than debunking intelligence about purported uranium sales to Iraq, as he has said, bolstered the case for most intelligence analysts."

In her husband Joseph Wilson's absurdly titled book, The Politics of Truth, he tells of their return to America from foreign shores in 1997, six years before her so-called "outing."

http://powerlineblog.com/archives/007135.php
The report states that a CIA official told the Senate committee that Plame "offered up" Wilson's name for the Niger trip, then on Feb. 12, 2002, sent a memo to a deputy chief in the CIA's Directorate of Operations saying her husband "has good relations with both the PM [prime minister] and the former Minister of Mines (not to mention lots of French contacts), both of whom could possibly shed light on this sort of activity." The next day, the operations official cabled an overseas officer seeking concurrence with the idea of sending Wilson, the report said.

The report also said Wilson provided misleading information to The Washington Post last June. He said then that he concluded the Niger intelligence was based on documents that had clearly been forged because "the dates were wrong and the names were wrong."
"Committee staff asked how the former ambassador could have come to the conclusion that the 'dates were wrong and the names were wrong' when he had never seen the CIA reports and had no knowledge of what names and dates were in the reports," the Senate panel said. Wilson told the panel he may have been confused and may have "misspoken" to reporters. The documents -- purported sales agreements between Niger and Iraq -- were not in U.S. hands until eight months after Wilson made his trip to Niger.
Wilson's reports to the CIA added to the evidence that Iraq may have tried to buy uranium in Niger, although officials at the State Department remained highly skeptical, the report said.
Wilson said that a former prime minister of Niger, Ibrahim Assane Mayaki, was unaware of any sales contract with Iraq, but said that in June 1999 a businessman approached him, insisting that he meet with an Iraqi delegation to discuss "expanding commercial relations" between Niger and Iraq -- which Mayaki interpreted to mean they wanted to discuss yellowcake sales. A report CIA officials drafted after debriefing Wilson said that "although the meeting took place, Mayaki let the matter drop due to UN sanctions on Iraq."
According to the former Niger mining minister, Wilson told his CIA contacts, Iraq tried to buy 400 tons of uranium in 1998.

also see a complete list of lies, inaccuracies and falsehoods here:
http://www.gop.com/News/Read.aspx?ID=5630

Here's my first nominations to the UK terror deportation list-

My 2 nominations for UK deportation:

Sheikh Omar Bakri Mohammed

and Guardian reporter Dilpazier Aslam

On Monday, Sheikh Omar Bakri Mohammed said: "The British people did not make enough effort to stop its own government committing its own atrocities in Iraq and Afghanistan."
He told the London Evening Standard: "They showed Tony Blair full support when they elected him Prime Minister again even after he waged the latest war against Iraq."
And the Syrian father-of-seven continued: "I blame the British government and I blame the British people. They are the ones who should be blamed.
"The British government has said, 'You are with us or with terrorism'. I don't think that is the way forward."
Bakri moved to the UK in 1985 after being deported from Saudi Arabia because of his membership of a banned group.

here"s dilpazier's column from a couple days ago, comiseration with the bombers.

We rock the boat

Today's Muslims aren't prepared to ignore injustice

Dilpazier AslamWednesday July 13, 2005

The Guardian

http://www.guardian.co.uk/comment/story/0,3604,1527323,00.html

If I'm asked about 7/7, I - a Yorkshire lad, born and bred - will respond first by giving an out-clause to being labelled a terrorist lover. I think what happened in London was a sad day and not the way to express your political anger.
Then there's the "but". If, as police announced yesterday, four men (at least three from Yorkshire) blew themselves up in the name of Islam, then please let us do ourselves a favour and not act shocked.


Earlier this year I attended a mosque in Leeds for Friday prayers. It was in the month of Ramadan, when Islamic fervour is at its most impassioned, yet in the sermon, to a crowd of hundreds - many of whom were from Iraq - Falluja was not referred to once; not even in the cupped-hands prayers after the sermon was over.
I prayed my Eid prayer in a mosque in Sheffield and, though most there were sickened and angry about events in Iraq, the imam chose not to mention Falluja either. We "youngsters" - some now in our 40s - had seen it before. This was deliberate silence, in case the boat rocked.
Perhaps now is the time to be honest with each other and to stop labelling the enemy with simplistic terms such as "young", "underprivileged", "undereducated" and perhaps even "fringe". The don't-rock-the-boat attitude of elders doesn't mean the agitation wanes; it means it builds till it can be contained no more.
· Dilpazier Aslam is a Guardian trainee journalist
dilpazier.aslam@guardian.co.uk

Check out the awesome new site for NY City Republicans, created by Slantpoint

http://www.urbanelephants.com/nyc/

Wednesday, July 20, 2005

Priorities on the Left? not capturing and holding terrorists, thank you very much

Polipundit highlights today's vote in favor of the status quo at Gitmo.

Republicans
In favor: 223.Opposed: 4.Present: 2.Not voting: 1.
Democrats
In favor: 81.Opposed: 119.Not voting: 2.
Think about that for a moment.
Nearly 60 percent of the Democrat House caucus voted against the status quo at Gitmo, and, by implication, against the ruthless prosecution of the war against Islamo-fascist terrorism.
Astonishing. But not surprising.
Harry S Truman is rolling over in his grave.

Just wondering what the point is of war protestors now....

now that almost all suicide bombings in Israel, Iraq, London, et all are targetting civilians, can we now move past the tired b-s argument that American troops are making terrorism worse? Wouldnt that argument make more sense if they were targeting us troops more often, rather than innocents?

How does killing innocent people show your protest against "invaders and conquerors"

Just stupid.

So now we get down to it. Britain vs. Pakistan, unless Pakistan really cracks down.

So the bombers are now proven to have known their target - they are not dupes as was suspected.
The link with Pakistan is now complete, with the UK bred mastermind caught at a madrassa, and in the past trained at the camps and met Osama.

The same terrrorist met Ujama, the guy who tried to set up camps in Oregon.

This is the real deal here folks, connections to the whole terror group. There can be no arguing that Iraq or Afghanistan had anything to do with the London bombing. This was done by the same group of guys who plotted with the 9/11 bombers.

Put this together with the State visit of the indian Prime Minister, and Pakistan is now compelled more than even after 9/11 to cooperate.


from the Times, UK
Aswat, 30, who is believed to come from the same West Yorkshire town as one of the bombers, arrived in Britain a fortnight before the attacks to orchestrate final planning for the atrocity. He spoke to the suicide team on his mobile phone a few hours before the four men blew themselves up and killed fifty-two other people.
Intelligence sources told The Times that during his stay Aswat visited the home towns of all four bombers as well as selecting targets in London.
Aswat has been known to Western intelligence services for more than three years after the FBI accused him of trying to set up al-Qaeda training camps in the US. When he was arrested in a madrassa (religious school), Aswat is understood to have been posing as a businessmen and using a false name. He was picked up in a raid at a madrassa at Sargodha, 90 miles from Islamabad, by Pakistani intelligence officials and flown to a jail in the capital.
Security sources there told The Times that he was armed with a number of guns, wearing an explosive belt and carrying around £17,000 in cash. He had a British passport and was about to flee across the border to Afghanistan.
Aswat, who is thought to have stayed in the madrassa with two of the British suicide bombers, is being questioned over claims that one — Mohammad Sidique Khan — telephoned him on the morning of the July 7 attack.
Intelligence sources claim that there were up to twenty calls between Aswat and two of the bombers in the days leading up to the bombing of three Tube trains and a double-decker bus. A senior Pakistani security source said: “We believe this man had a crucial part to play in what happened in London.”
Tony Blair has telephoned President Musharraf about the crackdown on militants which has led to more than 200 arrests in Pakistan since the weekend.
Officials in Islamabad say that eight men are directly linked to the London investigation, and were in telephone contact with Shehzad Tanweer, 22, and Khan, 30, a former primary school assistant.
Aswat is believed to have had a ten-year association with militant groups and met Osama bin Laden while attending an al-Qaeda training camp at Khalden in Afghanistan.
FBI documents obtained by The Times reveal details of how a London-based cleric sent Aswat to America in 1999 to set up camps in Oregon for US-born recruits.
The papers indicate that Aswat spent three months in America and engaged in firearms and poisons training but decided against using a remote ranch in Bly as an al-Qaeda camp. The CIA is keeping in close touch with Aswat’s interrogation and British detectives are seeking permission to speak to him.
The FBI is to question a number of figures held in the US, including James Ujaama, an American convert to Islam who met Aswat, and a second al-Qaeda emissary in Seattle.
Ujaama has pleaded guilty to assisting the Taleban and is now a “co-operating witness” who has given details of Aswat’s activities in the US.

Monday, July 18, 2005

There can be no negotiation with terrorists

Just like th ebully in the ballfield, backing down will only get you punched in the nose. Marc Shulman Points out that truth.

For some new readers ; )

For several new readers out there, I am blogging from New York City. A Republican, to be sure, but to the extent that I probably could have been a JFK Democrat had I been around then. I believe in free markets, low taxes, opportunity for all and freedom and liberty for the oppressed.

I started this blog to highlight the oppression that millions of people are living under in the middle east, and how our sacrifice for their freedom might finally be the true catalyst to our security that a military solution can never be. We will never be able to catch or kill every terrorist - we need to co-opt and dissuade large numbers of them. I believe that 9/11 was a history changing event because it forced us to finally listen to the terrorists when they say they want to kill us. Before, we could ignore and write-off what they were saying as crazy talk.

Basically I believe that if we do not fight this war now, and change the culture of dictatorships across the middle east that foster the hatred demonstrated on 9/11, we will suffer an attack in the future, so brutal that we will be forced to END certain civilizations, thereby ending our own.

February 23, 2005.

After 9/11, Americans realized that the foreign policy in effect for the Middle East for nearly 60 years was a mistake. In order to contain the Soviet Union and ensure a steady supply of oil to the Free world, our leaders made the strategic decision to support dictators in many of the countries in South West Asia, which led to theft of state property by corruption high unemployment and overall mismanagement of these countries. The US focused on one problem - the Soviet Union, and unfortunately, millions of people suffered.Now, however, President Bush made the inspired choice to fix this error, and to support the freedoms that everyone on Earth fully deserve. The people of Afghanistan, unfree and mired in wars for decades are now free and slowly beginning to prosper. The people of Iraq, suffering under a madman for decades are now taking control of their own freedom, with the assistance of the US military. 8 million people voted last month, and they will continue to gain in freedom, security and prosperity.The people of Lebanon deserve to be free, to not have to live under imprisonment and threat of car bombs. It is time the Syrian army leave Lebanon finally.

We have seen our vulnerability - and we have seen its deepest source. For as long as whole regions of the world simmer in resentment and tyranny - prone to ideologies that feed hatred and excuse murder - violence will gather, and multiply in destructive power, and cross the most defended borders, and raise a mortal threat. There is only one force of history that can break the reign of hatred and resentment, and expose the pretensions of tyrants, and reward the hopes of the decent and tolerant, and that is the force of human freedom.

To promote peace in the broader Middle East, we must confront regimes that continue to harbor terrorists and pursue weapons of mass murder. Syria still allows its territory, and parts of Lebanon, to be used by terrorists who seek to destroy every chance of peace in the region. You have passed, and we are applying, the Syrian Accountability Act -- and we expect the Syrian government to end all support for terror and open the door to freedom.

Wednesday, July 13, 2005

Pressure coming on Musharraf

Pakistan knows that it's in a world of trouble now. The attackerrs were Pakistani, and possibly trained in Pakistan camps (via Counter terror blog)
View the statement from the Pakistani foreign minister here:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/south_asia/4678969.stm
"Pakistan has said it helped Britain thwart a militant attack before May's general election in the UK. Interior Minister Aftab Khan Sherpao said Islamabad provided information that had led to "some arrests". He also pledged Pakistan would provide any more useful information it had. The Home Office refused to comment.


Counterterrorism Blog highlights:

London Terrorism Investigation Heading Towards Pakistani Terrorist Camps - Just Like the Lodi Case - hmmm...
Several articles about the London attacks on the Sky News website remind me of the Lodi, CA terrorism case. Of particular interest to me is the biography of 22-year-old Shehzad Tanweer, son of a native Pakistani. Sky quotes "a neighbor and friend" as saying Tanweer told him that he went to Afghanistan for a couple of months and Pakistan for 4 months with several friends as recently as 6 months ago. But one of Tanweer's uncles told Sky News that Tanweer didn't go to Afghanistan. "There is no way, I have seen his passport." Recall that Hamid Hayat of Lodi, age 23, admitted that he attended a Pakistani terrorist training camp for 6 months in 2003-4 (Daveed Gartenstein-Ross's post, quoting the FBI affidavit). Recall also that Evan Kohlmann noted here that "Since 2002, several suspected terrorist training camps affiliated with Al-Qaida have surfaced along the Pakistani-Afghan border in Waziristan."
Gee, you don't think Tanweer and Hayat might have trained together, do you...
Posted by Andrew Cochran at 03:28 PM

Tuesday, July 12, 2005

More of my analysis, and a link to State of Flux Blog

great analysis by Minh-Duc.

Gouhlishly, however, I would argue that the planning was quite poor, for all it was cracked up to be, and the bombings could have been much more devastating - for all the talk of how difficult it was for the survivors of the deepest tube bombs to escape, the bombers left them a way out that could easily have been eliminated if they had doubled up on 2 trains, rather than choose 4 targets. Similar effect to the elimination of exits available at the WTC. I dread this, as I use the NYC subway daily.

Additionally, unlike the WTC attackers who required ID to board airplanes, and thus were identified by outsiders to the plot, namely the flight attendants, these attackers (as far as the I read the media) took no precautions to guard their identities and by extension their support groups, which there must be several people - owner/renter of buildings, bomb-maker, explosive trafficker, look-outs and planners and extremist mosque contact / cell leader (in all likelihood).

I therefore think that there must be a fairly large support group in the Luton-Leeds area because of the left-over explosives found by the cops. I also expect a rapid shakedown of all extremist Mosques in Britain over the next few months, and significant pressure brought to bear on Musharraf internationally. This actually makes a lot of sense as there are rumors in the last couple months that the Brits are taking over policing of Afghanistan with our exit to focus on Iraq.

good night.

Wonderful new blog

Minh Duc's complete post from July 3.

Very nice blog, I found it courtesy of Belmont Club today.

“Adopted Homeland” is what some immigrants would call America. In my case, America adopted me. I was among the tired, the poor, the huddled masses yearning to breathe free and America took me in as one of her own son. There are those who would take every opportunity to smear America (here is an example in the comment section), they know not my story. Let me recount my story. I was born in a wretched land half way around the world, a land where I was a little more than a slave and far less a man. I could never went to college because of my father status (he was not a card carrying Communist). In fact, my chance of finishing High School was slim due to political discrimination.I ran off, barely escaped with my life and arrived here on this land, and since then have come to love America. She was kind, sweet, and exceptional. In America, dream can become reality as long as one is willing to work for it. A place where a first generation immigrant is made to feel he is home, that he is part of the greater society. That his naturalization is not merely a piece of document, but a welcome embrace into a loving family, an equal to all. America gave me back my humanity, my dignity, and an ability to believe in the goodness of mankind.

Analysis so far

1 There wil be many co-conspirators identified in this. The 2 cars with explosives still inside point to a large group of people organizing this.

2 Much pressure will come to Prevez Musharraf, as the bombers are Pakistani

3 Massive changes in UK laws regarding immigration, naturalization and hate speech will pass within weeks with extremist mosques shut down, imams expelled.

4 A rethinking of the Israeli suicide bomber problem will occur to the general population, as now London and Israel are forever linked by Suicide Bomb.

additional rumors on a futher Israel link are here:
http://web.israelinsider.com/Articles/Security/5997.htm

"The terror attack in London last week may be tied to a suicide bombing on Tel Aviv's beachfront in April 2003, German newspaper Bild am Sonntag reported. According to the paper, Mossad officials informed British security officials that the explosive material used in the Tel Aviv attack on Mike's Place pub was apparently also utilized to stage the bombings in London on Thursday. The Mossad office in London received advance notice about the attacks, but only six minutes before the first blast, the paper reports, confirming an earlier AP report. As a result, it was impossible to take any action to prevent the blasts. "They reached us too late for us to do something about it," a Mossad source is quoted as saying. The German newspaper reported that the Mossad relayed an analysis of the explosives used in the Mike's Place attack to British security officials, with sources in the Israeli intelligence agency quoted as saying there is a "high likelihood" the explosives used in Tel Aviv were the same ones used in London. After analyzing the explosive material used in the Mike's Place attack, the Mossad concluded it was produced in China and later smuggled into Britain, the paper reported. The explosives were apparently stashed by terrorists connected to al-Qaeda who were able to evade raids by British security forces. Mossad Chief Meir Dagan is reported to have said that the explosive in question is very powerful, and "much more lethal than plastic explosives and can be smuggled undetected due to its composition." The Mossad determined that the substance was developed and produced at the Chinese ZDF arms factory, located about 65 kilometers (about 40 miles) from Beijing, the paper reported. However, the German story was not clear as to whether the Mossad is involved in any way in the investigation into the London bombings. 3 people murdered at Mike's Place The Mike's Place attack killed three people, Ran Baron, 24, Yanai Weiss, 46, and Caroline Dominique Hess, 29. The bombing was carried out by two terrorists, Asif Mohammed Hanif and Omar Khan Sharif, who were recruited by Hamas in Britain and affiliated with the International Solidarity Movement in Gaza, where they stayed before carrying out the murder. The two entered Israel using their British passports. Hanif blew himself up at the beachfront Tel Aviv pub, but Sharif failed to detonate his explosives and fled the scene in shame. A few weeks later, his body washed up on a Tel Aviv beach. The terrorists' relatives were detained in Britain after the attack on suspicion they knew of the plot and did nothing to prevent the attack. The relatives' trial ended in July of last year, with the court ordering a retrial for Sharif's sister and brother. "

Summary of London Attacks so far

As the US media has been lax so far, I thought it might be helpful to provide a written summary, and a bit of analysis.

London media suggests that the 4 attacks were suicide bombers, 3 from Leeds and 1 from Luton. They have been identified with personal documents and closed circuit cameras.
""We have since found personal documents bearing the names of three of those four men close to the seats of three of the explosions.""
http://www.sky.com/skynews/article/0,,30000-13385127,00.html
"The four travelled by car from West Yorkshire to Luton and then by train to Kings Cross station shortly before the attacks were launched on Thursday morning, police said at a press conference.
Their images were captured by CCTV cameras - one police source said the men were chatting "as though they were going on a hiking holiday"."

Interestingly, police detonated explosives taken from the car parked in Luton. Very interesting to me because it suggests that either 1, the bombers expected to return to the car or 2, there was an additional bomber who dropped out or 3, a co conspirator.

"Meanwhile, detectives later identified a second suspect car in Leighton Buzzard, Bedfordshire."
http://www.sky.com/skynews/article/0,,30000-1188898,00.html

" One of the bombers was named by locals as Shahzad Tanweer, 22, who neighbours said was a "very nice lad".

http://www.sky.com/skynews/article/0,,30000-13386011,00.html
"Three of the bombers are reported to be British males of Pakistani origin aged 19, 22 and 30 and from Leeds in West Yorkshire.
The 19-year-old is reported to have told his parents he was going to London with friends on the day of the attacks.
He was reported missing by his parents at 10.20pm on Thursday. The 22-year-old was named locally as Shahzad Tanweer. Friends said he was a cricket loving sports science graduate.

The men travelled by car to Luton railway station

Sources say there is "strong" forensic evidence linking Tanweer to the blast on the underground train near Aldgate.
Sajaad Hussain, of Beeston, Leeds, said he had grown up with the bombing suspect. He said: "I knew him. He's a very nice lad, a very nice lad.
"We were brought up together on the same street. He was just a nice lad, you know, kept himself to himself. I'm, like everything, shocked, surprised...but I don't feel sorry for him because he took innocent lives.
"He liked to play football, play cricket. I'm just shocked like everybody else."
Another friend Mohammed Answar, 19, said they played cricket together last week.
He said: "It's impossible. It's not in his nature to do something like this, he's is the type of guy who would condemn things like that."
Another friend, Azzy Mohammed, 21, said: "He's the kind of person who gets along with anyone. His sense of humour is very good. He's a sweet lad."
Neighbours said he was a "good Muslim" who lived with his parents, a younger brother and two sisters.
His father is understood to own a local fish and chip shop.
"

Two of the other bombers were reported to be aged 30 and 19.
Sky News terror expert Steve Park said the documents may have been deliberately planted to "send police the wrong way".
Meanwhile, police have raided the homes of three of the four men in West Yorkshire along with three other houses in Leeds."


Houses were raided on the following roads in Leeds:
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,22989-1691385,00.html
"By mid morning police had cordoned off a semi-detached house in Colwyn Road in the Beeston area of Leeds, and a terrace house in Stratford Street, around two minutes walk away. A section of Tempest Road, which runs parallel to Colwyn Road, was also sealed off.
Local residents said one of the people living at 51 Colwyn Road was 22-year-old Shahzad Tanweer. Some people said Mr Tanweer had not been seen for a number of days."

"Later in the morning explosives officers carried out a controlled explosion to gain access to a property in Hyde Park Road, Burley, so that a search could be conducted for explosives. More than 500 people were evacuated from homes, businesses and the Leeds Grand Mosque in the surrounding area."

The first roads, Colwyn, Stratford and Tempest are south east of Leeds. The other, Hyde Park road, is only blocks away from the Leeds Grand Mosque. 1 of 2 mosques in the Leeds area:
Leeds Mosque
0113 244 5400
9 Woodsley Rd
Leeds, LS6 1SN
leedsgrandmosque.org.uk

Al Madina Mosque
0113 275 2535
31 Brudenell Grove
Leeds, LS6 1HR

Friday, July 08, 2005

http://www.axisglobe.com/ started a new section on Belarus. As you know, we need to clean that place up too.

Europe's Black Hole
Mostly on the issue of its military-industrial complex and arms deals with the rogue states.
check it out.
http://www.axisglobe.com/article.asp?article=207
http://www.axisglobe.com/article.asp?article=209
http://www.axisglobe.com/article.asp?article=211
http://www.axisglobe.com/article.asp?article=217

Attn: Duncan Black and F

Where are those Operation Yellow Elephant jerks now.

Says your ally, Armed Liberal:
It would be funny if it weren't so predictable; Duncan Black (Atrios) has been waving the "chickenhawk" meme again.
I thought I'd beaten this to death and put a stake in it. It's an immoral position, a politically naive position, and one that undermines our polity. Plus it's just plain rude.
But let's play the hand out a bit. As I noted before, as a fellow liberal, I'll bet he supports higher taxes on the rich (see this Google search).
When Duncan asks his paymaster, George Soros, or his candidate John Kerry, to voluntarily pay higher taxes - because it's a policy he supports - he can open his mouth try and intimidate a bunch of GOP kids into silence without being such an obvious hypocrite.
I'm sure Soros could easily write a check for $10 - $20 million, and in seriously encouraging him doing that, Duncan could provide leadership that might actually crack open the taxes issue.
I won't be holding my breath.

Thursday, July 07, 2005

These are the animals we are fighting

Norm http://normblog.typepad.com/normblog/ has it right.

( courtesy of http://andrewsullivan.com/ )

1. They attack Red Cross personnel.
2. They murder people working for the UN.
3. They kidnap and kill care workers.
4. They bomb holiday-makers, in nightclubs.
5. They blow up people travelling on trains - civilians.
6. They target people on buses - civilians.
7. They take civilian hostages.
8. They decapitate them.
9. They murder trade unionists.
10. They kidnap diplomats.
11. They kill people for being... barbers.
12. They fly aircraft full of civilians into skyscrapers where people are at work.
13. They take schoolchildren hostage and murder them.
14. They bomb synagogues.
15. They kill people shopping in a market.
16. They kill people queuing at a medical clinic.
17. They murder children in Baghdad.
18. They murder people on their way to work in London.

Confirm Bolton - The US needs a UN rep to vote for condolences in the UN

CONFIRM BOLTON

I want to know why Bolton is not confirmed. The US does not have a UN representative with which to vote our condolences at the UN.

Shame on the Democrats for the obstruction which has led to this.

London is different from Israel how?

Please explain to me know, how Bus bombs are terrorism in London, and "freedom fighting" in Israel.
Terrorism is Terrorism, folks.


First of all, the G-8 might could decide to throw even more weight behind the push for a new comprehensive anti terrorism convention. The key element in such a convention would be a clear and straight forward definition of terrorism that would eliminate any wiggle-room countries now have to protect favored ‘so-called freedom fighters’ even though they employ terrorist tactics. It would also require all countries to either prosecute or extradite those engaged in terrorist activities. Now is the time for G-8 leaders to push energetically for such a convention.
Secondly, the G-8 might put new energy behind its previous CTAG initiative. That initiative called for the identification of countries that lacked the resources or the political will to carry out agreed international counter-terrorism measures. Once identified special resource assistance would be offered. Where appropriate, further measures might also be adopted to press these countries to conform to their international obligations. Unfortunately, so little has been accomplished so far under this 2002 G-8 initiative.
Third, the G-8 might decide to expand on the very useful bi-lateral relationships some of them have established to share intelligence and other information concerning terrorists. This might include a central data bank of information on known and suspected terrorists, that could be shared widely among participating countries. For their part the EU countries might choose to accelerate their plans to upgrade their Schengen Information System ahead of the scheduled 2007 inauguration.
Fourth, the UN Security Council is now about to consider new measures to re-enforce its counter-terrorism resolutions against Al Qaeda and associated individuals and entities. This should include an expansion of the obligations on member countries to take effective measures against known al Qaeda operatives and financiers. This should include an obligation that their host countries keep track of those designated by the UN’s Al Qaeda and Taliban Sanctions Committee, and report regularly to the Committee on their whereabouts.

Qaeda fights in Iraq and Afghanistan

Serious readers will notice the inclusion of both Iraq and Afghanistan in the Statement from Al Qaeda today. Divorcing the two is impossible. We are fighting terrorists in both places.

"Heroic Mujahedins carried out a sacred attack in London, and here is Britain burning in fear, terror and fright in the north, south, east and west," said a statement posted on the internet, which could not be authenticated.The previously unknown group said the attacks were "in response to the massacres carried out by Britain in Iraq and Afghanistan"."We have repeatedly warned the government and people of Britain, and we have now fulfilled our promise and have carried out a sacred military attack in Britain," it said."We continue to warn the governments of Denmark, Italy and all the Crusaders that they will meet the same punishment if they do not withdraw their troops from Iraq and Afghanistan."The group addressed the Arab and Islamic world, saying "it is time to take revenge from the Crusader and Zionist government in Britain, in retaliation for the massacres that Britain is committing in Iraq and Afghanistan".

Pray for the Brits, but remember Churchill

"We shall not fail or falter; we shall not weaken or tire. Neither the sudden shock of battle nor the long-drawn trials of vigilance and exertion will wear us down. Give us the tools and we will finish the job."

Wednesday, July 06, 2005

"End ag trade subsidies" - Bush

The best cure for the world's poor is free trade.

Conservatives really squawked last time when the last Ag subsidies bill in the US went up a lot. I think it was Bush's strategy, much like Reagan's defense buildup, to show Europe that we can match any budget they want to throw at their agriculture supports and we can beat them. Now the point is to get rid of all of them, and better serve the world.

Thanks to http://www.patrickruffini.com/ for pointing out the story:

LONDON (Reuters) -
President Bush said the United States will end subsidies to its farmers if Europe does the same, an offer the European Commission said it hoped would lead to a breakthrough at world trade talks later this year.
Asked in an interview broadcast on Monday if the United States would abolish farm subsidies if Europe did, Bush responded: "Absolutely, and I think we have an obligation to work together to do that."
"Let's join hands as wealthy industrialized nations and say to the world, we are going to get rid of all our agricultural subsidies together," Bush told ITV1 television ahead of a summit of the Group of Eight rich nations in Scotland on Wednesday.

"The position of the U.S. government is, we are willing to do so ... with our fine friends in the
European Union," he said.
Fischer Boel said Europe had put in place the biggest ever reform of the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP). Europe was ready to bind that reform into a deal at the
World Trade Organization, provided the U.S. did the same, she said in a statement.
EU farm subsidies were no longer trade-distorting while U.S. payments are still production-linked and "seriously distort trade," she said.
But Bush said: "We've got agricultural subsidies, not nearly to the extent that our friends in the EU have."
Fischer Boel said the EU had pledged to phase out all export subsidies.
"But before agreeing on an end date, we need our partners, in particular the U.S., to do the same, by phasing out export credits and the use of dubious 'food aid' to dispose of surpluses -- which is not a way to ensure long-term food security for developing countries," she added.

Meme is forming: align US policies with world interests

http://decision08.blogspot.com/ has the following from Terry McCrann :
US PRESIDENT George W. Bush has brilliantly nailed the feel-good politically correct worthlessness of both the Kyoto global 'warming' treaty and Live 8's make poverty 'history' in a stunning double play.He has done so not by attacking them directly, easy enough as that would be to do. Like a relative asked to comment on kindergarten artwork, he's too polite to so embarrass British PM Tony Blair, who's embraced them both.
But by offering alternatives that would actually work. And especially in helping Africa work, immediately and dramatically. : via the Malaria assistance.

This is exactly my point below. The US is maligned internationally not because our policies are necessarily against theirs, butbecause we were lax for years in aligning our policies with our interests....by that I mean our interest in promoting freedom. We are more secure when more people are free. Once the people of the middle east understand that we are looking our for their liberty, we will become less hated and there will be less support for terrorism in general.

Key point - we finally are aligning our interests with our policies, and those interests with the interests of the people of the world

Daily Demarche points out an interview with ...."Libyan President Moammar Gadhafi. Now that he is a more or less accepted world figure again (thank you, Bush Doctrine) we might want to listen to him:``Pleading to the G-8 to lift debts won't make a future for Africa,'' said Gadhafi, wearing his traditional African dress while praising Africa's natural resources and treasures. ``We need cooperation between the big and the small countries in the world.'' "
Dr. Demarche's point is that sometimes we disregard the views of the protesters throwing rocks, while sometimes we should have a listen to what they say, because they can be right, just a bit misguided.

I think this points out a key fact of Operation Iraqi Freedom and our new focus on democracy in the middle east.

For 60 years, we pursued stability in the middle east. Now we are pursuing freedom, finally looking towards the interests of the people of Iraq and that of the people of Lebanon, Egypt and the other.....not always instead of their leadership (however as Charles Krauthammer points out, sometimes the War on Terror forces us to work with their Leaders) but always in moving freedom and democracy forward in the region..using the power of our military, cancelled diplomatic visits, threatening to hold back $$$ Aid and pursing free trade deals.

The key is to change the mindset of the people from thinking that the US is supporting their corrupt leaders into understanding that we are interested in their freedom and their voice for liberty.

My personal view is that this is starting to break through the state media in the region . Witness Wallid Jumblatt, the 8 million voters in Iraq, more in Lebanon etc. It will take time, but we are on the right path.

Publius Pundit points out how important it is for the US to support our friends

The new Kyrgyz Foreign Minister says that her country is under pressure from its neighbors.
It is the only semi democratic country in the region, and we have a military base or 2 there. We need to focus on expanding our support to give them more security.

Thanks to http://www.publiuspundit.com/

By GRAEME SMITH
Monday, July 4, 2005 Page A11

MOSCOW -- The political climate of Central Asia has become so supportive of Uzbek President Islam Karimov that it's impossible to criticize the killing of protesters in Andijan, the Kyrgyz Foreign Minister says.
In an interview, Roza Otunbayeva suggested that she doesn't necessarily share the opinion of the leaders of Russia, China and Central Asian countries who will gather tomorrow for a meeting of the Shanghai Co-operation Organization.
Members of the group have closed ranks around Uzbekistan in the days before the meeting, declaring their support for Mr. Karimov and his bloody crackdown on May 13 that left hundreds of corpses in the streets.
Kyrgyzstan will remain silent on the issue. "We are very much committed to human rights," Ms. Otunbayeva said. "But sometimes the realpolitik is very tough."

........In the shadow of such major powers, the fledging, post-revolutionary Kyrgyz government cannot argue publicly, Ms. Otunbayeva said.
"We have a difference of opinion," she acknowledged, but added: "In this region, we are eternal neighbours. It's a difficult path. We face all sorts of problems."
"What happened in my country, the revolution of [March] 24, I do appreciate that none of our neighbours have been involved in our internal affairs. They didn't try to save Akayev as their comrade," she said, referring to former Kyrgyz president Askar Akayev, who fled to Russia during this spring's Tulip Revolution.
"You can talk about our braveness or not. But many countries, which are far away from Uzbekistan, they didn't express their opinion at all. They were very mildly critical, very mildly reflecting on these events."
Kyrgyzstan has been drawn into the Andijan drama by a group of about 500 survivors of the crackdown who escaped across the nearby Kyrgyz border. Uzbekistan has exerted pressure on its neighbour to return the escapees; the United Nations says that would be illegal under the 1951 convention on the status of refugees.
"These Andijan refugees from Uzbekistan are a very hot potato on my table, every day," Ms. Otunbayeva said.
Kyrgyzstan is trying to fulfill its international obligations, she said, but the country also has obligations to its neighbours among the former Soviet republics.
"The regional reality is different. We are between two realities."

Could there be possibly 4 SCOTUS retirements within a year???

I have to post this in the entirety, as Gary Miller at Kennedy v. the Machine has some amazing mews, but it's quite possibly a gobsmacking amazing whirlwind of possibility. I'll even vote for Hillary if W gets 4 SCOTUS nominations. It wont even matter then....oh, well, except for taxes, spending, the war, etc. never mind that then.

http://kennedyvmachine.com/

"On Friday, with the announced retirement of Sandra Day O’Connor from the Supreme Court, It took a few minutes for the news to set in on Capitol Hill, among Republicans and Democrats alike. After all, even the White House in briefing Republican leadership on the Hill spoke in the belief that it would be Chief Justice William Rehnquist who is retiring.
“The White House seemed to be expecting Rehnquist first, that was what my boss was getting briefed on,” says a staffer for a Senator sitting on the Judiciary Committee. “We were told Rehnquist in July, possibly later this year.”

Rumors are already swirling about a possible third retirement after November. The most likely would be Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, who according to former Supreme Court clerks may be in poorer health than Justice Rehnquist.
Here’s a wildcard for you: I have it on reasonably good authority that an unlikely retirement might be on the way, too. A Supreme Court insider told me several weeks ago that Souter may well retire. He apparently told friends and family that he has always planned to step down upon turning 65, and that he’d rather return to New Hampshire year-round than continue to spend time in D.C. He’s 65 now.
Then there’s the rumor from a DSCC staffer about a Stevens retirement. You can have your Rodham presidency. What’s she gonna do? "

Tuesday, July 05, 2005

MTV Sucks

I have to agree with Will Collier on this:

A Note To MTV
Posted by Will Collier · 3 July 2005
Dear MTV,
After seeing your "coverage" of yesterday's Live 8 concert, I have come to the conclusion that your network sucks like a turbocharged Electrolux.
This was not exactly a revelation, mind you; the "M" in "MTV" hasn't stood for "music" since, oh, I'd guess about the time of the original Live Aid broadcast in 1985. Which, of course, was a million times better than the pathetic, drivel-soaked and endlessly-interrupted-with-empty-"host"-blather excuse for coverage this year. Oh, and the picture quality was miserable as well. I've seen less pixelization in cheap Malaysian VCDs.
What kind of moron breaks away from the first full Pink Floyd performance in 25 years to have some twit talk about t-shirts he saw on a train? Are you people just stupid, or tasteless, or some sick combination of the two?

Monday, July 04, 2005

Bush visits West Virginia.....GOOOOOO Shelley !!!!!

Ms. Capito and her father, Archie A. Moore, Jr., the former governor, joined Mr. Bush onstage today in Morgantown. Lets just hope they had a nice discussion of her upcoming run against Byrd.

Support the Troops. Visit these sites.

http://anysoldier.com/index.cfm
http://americasupportsyou.mil

Happy Independence Day (nice picture at Jane's Armies of Liberation)

Yikes,
Sorry Jane.

Don Surber has a roundup of why this G8 poverty concert thing is so stupid

I must admit, I did enjoy the Pink Floyd reunion. That was awesome, but this thing missed the point.....The reason they're poor and hungry is because of their governments. Those governments are the most corrupt, stealing lying bunch (to quote Howard Dean) I've ever seen.
Check out his list of countries. Zimbabwe in particular - that was a rich country until thug Mugabe took over.

Captain's Quarters & The London Telegraph illustrate why the US is winning, and the terrorists are losing

http://news.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2005/07/04/wirq04.xml

The London Telegraph reports this morning that Iraqis have increasingly become so disenchanted with the insurgents -- both foreign and domestic -- that the tribal leaders have organized their own counterinsurgencies in areas like Qaim. These clan-based factions have turned on those who attempted to impose their own Taliban-like rules on communities:
Tribal leaders in Husaybah are attacking followers of Abu Musab Zarqawi, the Jordanian-born terrorist who established the town as an entry point for al-Qa'eda jihadists being smuggled into the country.
The reason, the US military believes, is frustration at the heavy-handed approach of the foreigners, who have kidnapped and assassinated local leaders and imposed a strict Islamic code. ...
Captain Thomas Sibley, intelligence officer of 3rd battalion, 2nd Marine Regiment, based in Qaim, said: "People here were committed supporters of the insurgency but you cannot now even get a marriage licence." ...
The trigger was the assassination of a tribal sheikh, from the Sulaiman tribe, ordered by Zarqawi for inviting senior US marines for lunch. American troops gained an insight into the measures the jihadists had imposed during recent house-to-house searches in nearby towns and villages.
The insurgents once had the sympathy of the locals, who presumably didn't like seeing foreign troops in their country. However, they soon found out that as bad as Saddam had been, the new so-called "insurgents" were just as malevolent. The satellite dishes got pulled down from roofs, music shops got shut down, women went under the burkha and men wearing western clothes got beaten. Because the Americans were the only people attempting to fix the water, sewage, and electrical systems, the enforced ban on assisting foreigners meant that all of those systems went into complete collapse.

Some people can't stand the thought of the US winning in Iraq

We are winning the military fight in Iraq.
Terrorists can only attack defenseless civillians or leave roadside bombs to have any chance of not being killed by US troops.
Terrorists cannot gather in any large number without the probability of being killed.
More and more Iraqis are signing up for police and army positions.
More and more Iraqis are giving tips against the terrorists.
Even the sunni 20% of the entire Iraq population is turning against the terrorists.

The political fight is working too.
The iraqi government is fully functioning, and the constitutional groups are beginning to draft a constitution, to be voted on in September.
The terrorists have no end game except death because there is no large popular movement for their motives.

Saturday, July 02, 2005

Next Steps

Train Iraqis
Keep up the pressure on the terrorists -fighting them where they are (In Iraq, for some of the dummies out there)
Close the Syrian Border
Keep the pressure on Iran in the UN Security Committe
Keep pushing Egypt for a free Presidential vote in October
A free vote in September and January in Iraq

Slowly transfer total responsibility for policing and agressive military action to Iraqis by summer 2006 and draw down US forces as possible in successful resolution of US action in Iraq.

Friday, July 01, 2005

Media Bias? NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

What the hell do American Indians have to do with a Dutch woman? She's probably never been to America, let alone met a Sioux Indian
Reuters knows....

AMSTERDAM (Reuters) - A Dutch woman who swears by a daily helping of herring for a healthy life celebrated her 115th birthday on Wednesday as the oldest living person on record.
Hendrikje van Andel-Schipper, a former needlework teacher, was born in 1890, the year Sioux Indians were massacred by the U.S. military at the Battle of Wounded Knee.
The passionate soccer fan celebrated her birthday in a nursing home in the northern Dutch town of Hoogeveen.
"She eats a piece of herring every day because it's good for the health," said Johan Beijering, director of the Westerkim nursing home. "She is still mentally full of vitality."
The daughter of a headmaster, Van Andel-Schipper was born in the town of Smilde in the northern Netherlands on June 29, 1890.
Also known as Hennie, she married a tax inspector in the 1930s and was forced to sell her jewellery to buy food during the German occupation in World War Two.
"A scan of our archive reveals that Hennie is also older than the Guinness World Records holder for the oldest man living, which makes her the oldest person in the world," said Guinness World Records book editor Craig Glenday.
The world's oldest living man on record, Emiliano Mercado Del Toro, lives in Puerto Rico. He was born on August 21, 1891.
The record for the longest life is held by 122-year-old French woman Jeanne-Louise Calment who died in 1997, according to Guinness World Records (www.guinnessworldrecords.com).

....Shakes one's faith in the reliability of the modern media.....hmmm

In person Mr Bush is so far removed from the caricature of the dim, war-mongering Texas cowboy of global popular repute that it shakes one’s faith in the reliability of the modern media.